Industry
.png)
The latest HMDA data makes the scale of the fallout problem impossible to ignore. Industry‑wide, lenders took about 6.9 million RESPA applications representing roughly $2.5 trillion in requested mortgage credit, yet only about 4.6 million loans and $1.7 trillion in volume actually funded—meaning just 59% of applications converted to closed loans, barely six in ten.

Most of the gap came from borrowers themselves: roughly three‑quarters of loans that failed to fund did so because the customer chose to withdraw, not because the lender formally declined the file. The lender lost the gain on sales and fees from a closed loan AND the lender spent $700–2,000 in credit reports, third‑party services, lead generation, and internal labor on each loan that fell out. The industry is effectively burning hundreds of billions of dollars of application volume and hundreds of millions of dollars of expense each year.
Against that backdrop, increasing lender profitability by 15–20 basis points is achieved by reducing fallout 3-5%. It starts with treating pull‑through improvement as a disciplined, data‑driven process that any lender can manage—then using agentic AI to automate and scale that process.
Most lenders glance at lock pull‑through weekly or monthly, but the real leverage comes from seeing fallout risk at the loan level, in near real time. A practical internal process looks like this:
Simple spreadsheets and standard report help risk rate active loans by their likelihood of fallout and the financial impact if they do. That alone shifts the conversation from “How big is our pipeline?” to “Which loans are we in danger of losing this week?”
Because most fallout is the borrower choosing to go elsewhere or they stop the process, your next task is to understand those choices. “Withdrawn” means the borrower withdraws, fails to provide information so the loan is closed for incomplete information, “ghosts” the lender, etc. Internally, that means:
By mapping these patterns to your fallout data, you can design specific interventions: training, process changes, or targeted pricing flexibility.
Operationalize this into a daily routine: Segment the list by action required:
- Provide simple, recommended actions for each segment: call scripts, email templates, condition‑clearing checklists, or escalation paths.
- At week’s end, review which at‑risk loans were saved and which were lost, and refine your rules accordingly.
Even done manually, this process tends to improve pull‑through because it focuses attention on the right loans at the right time, instead of treating the pipeline as a flat list. Each “saved” loan means a huge boost in profit: Gain on sale of $5,000-14,000 versus lost cost of $2,000 or more.
The challenge with a manual approach is bandwidth. This is where agentic AI changes the game—by doing what a disciplined analyst or sales manager would do, but continuously and at scale:
Conceptually, agentic AI is just an automated version of the disciplined process a lender could run by hand. That is precisely why it works: it encodes your best practices, then executes them tirelessly on every loan, every day.
When only 59% of RESPA applications become funded loans, every incremental improvement in pull‑through represents a large pool of “found” profitability:
For many lenders, that combination is worth 15–20 basis points of P/L improvement.
And declinations can be handled in a similar fashion with agentic AI.
Any lender can start this journey today with the tools they already have. As those practices mature, agentic AI is a scalable engine that executes the process continuously.
Teraverde has packaged this approach into a pre‑built agentic AI solution that plugs into existing systems and reflects these best practices out of the box. For lenders who want the benefits of disciplined pull‑through management and agentic automation—without building everything from scratch—Teraverde’s agent provides a ready‑to‑deploy solution increase profit and reduce fallout.